In any event, I honestly don't believe that me typing up a huge post explaining it will make a bit of difference - we've been over this many times. It's clear that the only logical conclusion is that there are 3 persons within the one substance of God. Then why must Christians accept them? If they truly add nothing new, why isn't the original source sufficient? Or is it just that the Bible doesn't explain itself very well?Įvery single one of the members of the Godhead are all called God. Why is it you can't do the same with respect to what the Apostles believed regarding the nature of God?) Don't you have one single, solitary quote you can give me to start off this "nice discussion"? (You have never had any trouble digging up obscure, out-of-context quotes to "prove" that your interpretation of Mormon theology is accurate. I wouldn't have started the thread if I hadn't wanted to have a discussion, Viz.īut you didn't provide any evidence of what they believed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |